%20(1).jpg)
%20(1).jpg)
.png)
If “Wuthering Heights” is a romance, it is the kind with more seething than swooning. Sure, its characters caress every hundred pages or so. But mostly it’s a lot of trudging across frosty moors, beating back mysterious illnesses and offloading anger on the next generation.Yet the book, Emily Brontë’s only novel, is revealing its prickly charms to a new wave of readers.The occasion is a movie adaptation from the director Emerald Fennell that will arrive in theaters just before Valentine’s Day. In preparation, thousands of people have picked up its source material, a Gothic tale of obsession and resentment published in 1847, the year before its author’s death.Some are greeting an old friend, or at least an old high school assignment. Others are new to Thrushcross Grange.“My ego won’t let me go see the movie without reading the book,” said Aadi Miglani, 23, who works in academic publishing in New York and is reading the novel for the first time. (No spoilers, please: She is on Chapter 18.)Sales of “Wuthering Heights” more than doubled in 2025 compared with the previous year, reaching 180,000 print copies in the United States, according to Circana Bookscan, a publishing industry tracker. Six bookstores reached by phone and email reported a bump in sales after September, when a trailer was released featuring the movie’s stars, Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi, looking windswept and broody.“You’re the fourth one we’ve sold today,” Stephanie Valdez, the owner of Community Bookstore in Brooklyn, told a reporter who came in for a copy during her lunch break.The 179-year-old novel has become the first assignment on the 2026 pop culture syllabus with help from Vogue, which selected it as the first pick for its new book club. It also got a clout boost from the singer Charli XCX, who is releasing a companion album to the film.During a period of hand-wringing about young people’s reluctance to read books, readers seem to be approaching “Wuthering Heights” as a collective undertaking. They are dissecting the novel in book clubs and group chats, scratching the same itch for group experiences as running clubs and board game nights. Lately, social media is teeming with testimonials from readers who are Brontë-maxxing.“74 pages into wuthering heights and why did nobody tell me that reading this is like eavesdropping on the most unhinged gossip you’ve ever heard,” went a TikTok summary posted by Toini Ilonummi, 30, who lives in the San Francisco Bay Area. “I’m obsessed.”On an 18-degree Saturday in January, a crowd of bundled-up readers filed into P&T Knitwear, a bookstore on the Lower East Side of Manhattan, where the online book club Belletrist and the romance publisher 831 Stories were hosting a three-hour “read-in” of the book.About 20 attendees, mostly young women, paged through either crisp new paperbacks or dog-eared editions that they had gotten as students. One marked passages with a lime green highlighter, while another kept her place with a bookmark decorated with pictures of the actor Pedro Pascal.Emma Keithley, who was curled up on a red cushion with her Penguin Classics edition, remembered “slogging through” the novel as a teenager and finding it darker than she expected. As part of a high school icebreaker, she had been asked what book she would bring with her to a deserted island.“I was like, ‘Wuthering Heights,’ to try and sound smart,” said Ms. Keithley, 27, a wholesale manager who lives in Brooklyn. She cringed. “It still keeps me up at night that I told someone that’s my deserted island book.”Her roommate, Fatima Calderon, a 27-year-old graphic designer, asked if it would still be her choice.“I’m going to read it again,” Ms. Keithley said. “We’ll see, we’ll see.”Andrew Morin, 23, an economic consultant, was 25 pages into the book on his Kindle. He said he had been working through 19th-century novels by Henry James and Jane Austen as part of a bid to claw back his attention span in a world of snappy, short-form video content.When another reader mentioned her curiosity about Ms. Fennell’s take on the story, he laughed. “I didn’t know there was a movie,” he said.Film adaptations of “Wuthering Heights” tend to compress its multigenerational tale into a more straightforward two-person love story, said Deborah Denenholz Morse, an English professor at the College of William and Mary. Brontë scholars are already in a lather about “erotic excess” in the trailer for Ms. Fennell’s version, she said. (It includes gasping, licking and the suggestive kneading of dough.)“I can’t tell you all the graduate students who have written to me saying: ‘Professor Morse, have you seen this adaptation? It’s going to wreck “Wuthering Heights”!’” she said.The movie’s steamy rollout seems intended to appeal to readers of contemporary romance, a category that has exploded in popularity in recent years. When Fernanda Castro read “Wuthering Heights” this month for her romance book club, she was not exactly swept off her feet by its central duo, Catherine and Heathcliff.“Reading it as a 28-year-old, I realized how toxic their relationship is,” said Ms. Castro, a consultant in Austin, Texas, who first read the book as a teenager.She was also struck by its depiction of class and race. She said she was skeptical about the new movie, which drew backlash last year with the casting of Mr. Elordi, a white actor, as Heathcliff, a character described as “dark-skinned” in the novel. “Without the racism that Heathcliff experiences, there is no book: That is the central conflict, and driver to the plot, in my opinion,” she said.Even so, she added, “I already have tickets.”Professor Morse is also no fan of Mr. Elordi’s casting: “That’s a problem because it elides an entire strand of the novel,” she said. But despite some doubts about the new movie, she said she supported anything that drew new readers to the most poetic of the Brontë sisters’ novels.“Wuthering Heights,” she said, “is a novel of struggle, and part of the struggle is to see what that’s romantic can actually survive.”At the bookstore in Manhattan, several readers said they hardly cared if the film was a triumph. Mostly, they were happy that it had brought them back to the experience of reading in a group — without any threat of grades or papers.“Nobody assigns you classics in adult life,” said Molly Doyle Young, 30, who works in product marketing. Nearby, another guest wondered what to read after “Wuthering Heights.” Several heads snapped in her direction.“‘Jane Eyre’!” one person said.“‘Jane Eyre’ is good.”“You should read ‘Jane Eyre.’” (Callie Holtermann)
Like many members of this book club (I’ll wager), I have a notebook somewhere in which I copied lines from Wuthering Heights as a teen. Admittedly, it was a much more analog era, when people used pen and paper rather than the Notes app. I can almost summon the color of the ink on the page—but what I’ve never forgotten was the line itself: “He wanted all to lie in an ecstasy of peace; I wanted all to sparkle and dance in a glorious jubilee.”For years, I’ve carried this line around in my mental notebook as an evocation of the most effervescent love a person could conjure: a union of joyous opposites! Except, maybe not.When I got to the line this time (my third reading, I think), it was Cathy junior (not the original Catherine, as I’d thought) who uttered it to describe a feud with her cousin, the peevish, charismaless Linton, over what would constitute a perfect day. “I said his heaven would be only half alive, and he said mine would be drunk,” she continues. “I said I should fall asleep in his, and he said he could not breathe in mine, and he began to grow very snappish.” Opposites attract and all that, but this is not the material of magnetism.How could I have misrecalled something so fundamental? The language of Wuthering Heights is so dense but so melodic, so complicated but rewarding, and it’s struck me, on this most recent rereading, that there is a certain degree of enchantment that takes place when one first makes one’s way through its seductive thicket. Did I lose the thread in that forest? Or did I just, after putting it down that first time, close my mind to what came after the doomed love of Catherine and Heathcliff and remember the novel only for those star-crossed lovers? They are particularly appealing to a moody teen.Now, on my third reading, about two decades later, I’m not sure this is a love story at all—no matter how firmly etched those two lunatics are in the pantheon of devoted lovers. Entire generations who (like me) first read Wuthering Heights in high school may be holding on not only to lines and passages they slightly (or entirely) misremember, but also to an image of iconic love that is…more than a little messed up?No matter how much the famous lines resound, it’s hard to argue that Catherine and Heathcliff are the paragon of romance. In the very same scene that sees Catherine declare, of Heathcliff, “Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same,” she vows to marry another “because he is handsome, and pleasant to be with,” and because he will make her rich—lovely!The bond between Heathcliff and Catherine is less pure than born of a sense of persecution, an us-versus-them embattledness: The two soul mates versus Catherine’s virulent brother Hindley; the two wild creatures of the moors, peering through the windows of Thrushcross Grange at the insipidly civilized Lintons. “I left her,” Heathcliff says, recounting the story of how Catherine first comes, accidentally, to spend time at the Grange, “kindling a spark of spirit in the vacant blue eyes of the Lintons—a dim reflection from her own enchanting face—I saw they were full of stupid admiration.” Years later, Catherine's love for Heathcliff seems most activated when she senses the drift of Heathcliff’s attention—and it is his unfaithfulness that prompts her to most explicitly disdain the man she has married instead. “Your veins are full of ice-water,” she says to her even-keeled husband, Edgar, “but mine are boiling, and the sight of such chillness makes them dance.” And there is no small element of torture involved in Catherine and Heathcliff’s relationship, almost as if the pleasure and joy that they bring each other can only be appreciated when they’re deprived of it. How strange—or maybe not—that I’ve never heard passages of Wuthering Heights quoted during wedding vows.What are the purest examples of love in this book? Reading as a married mother, decades separated from my own roiling teenage loves, I’m struck that the most believable examples of love in Wuthering Heights are much quieter and more parental or filial: Edgar for his daughter Cathy, and hers for him; Nelly for the “little lamb” Hareton, whom she raises as her own before she is banished from the Heights. Isabella’s love for her hard-to-love son Linton happens mostly offscreen, but seems to have some genuine affection behind it, as well—it’s almost the only thing Linton speaks of favorably. (Set aside, for a moment, examples of the opposite: Hindley’s virulent and inexplicable hatred of his son Hareton; Heathcliff’s careless and manipulative use of his own son for revenge.)Yes, I’m aware that no one reads this novel and comes away from it feeling like it’s a story about the beauty of parental love. But—and this is undoubtedly a function of where I am in my own life—these were the scenes that pressed most pointedly on my heart, this time around. “Catherine’s despair was as silent as her father’s joy,” Brontë writes of the daughter attending her father on his deathbed, withholding her own suffering so that he may have a peaceful passage. Catherine and Heathcliff’s antics didn’t affect me this time—it was that line that got me.Like all great works of literature, Wuthering Heights rewards rereading. You may encounter a beloved and familiar line that reveals itself completely foreign; you may re-arrange your entire concept of the book. (Chloe Schama)
“The thing is that it’s my favorite book in the world,” the filmmaker told The Hollywood Reporter on the red carpet. “Like many people who love this book, I’m kind of fanatical about it, so I knew right from the get-go I couldn’t ever hope to make anything that could even encompass the greatness of this book. All I could do was make a movie that made me feel the way the book made me feel, and therefore it just felt right to say it’s Wuthering Heights, and it isn’t.”One of the most talked-about changes comes with Elordi’s casting as Heathcliff, who is described as dark-skinned in the book. Of the decision to cast a white actor in the role, Fennell explained, “I think the thing is everyone who loves this book has such a personal connection to it, and so you can only ever make the movie that you sort of imagined yourself when you read it. I don’t know, I think I was focusing on the pseudo-masochistic elements of it.”“The great thing about this movie is that it could be made every year and it would still be so moving and so interesting,” she continued. “There are so many different takes. I think every year we should have a new one.”Elordi said himself of the changes to the iconic story, “There are inverted commas for a reason. This is Emerald’s vision and these are the images that came to her head at 14 years old; somebody else’s interpretation of a great piece of art is what I’m interested in — new images, fresh images, original thoughts.”The film also marks Robbie and Fennell’s first time working together as actress and director, after Robbie produced Fennell’s last two projects, Saltburn and Promising Young Woman. Robbie and her LuckyChap team once again produce this one, as the star noted it was the longtime plan to release the film on Galentine’s Day.“I was like if it was me, I’d want to go with all of my girlfriends on a Friday night — I want to have cocktails and maybe dress up a little bit, and then I’d want to go with my husband or whoever on Valentine’s the next night. So it felt like the perfect weekend for it,” Robbie said, as Elordi echoed, “It’s a day for love and it’s when everyone in the world is thinking about love; this movie, if it’s about anything, is about love.”Charli xcx, fresh off her buzzy Sundance debut, also walked the carpet, as she explained that Fennell sent her the screenplay “at the end of 2024; I was in London in December, it was like getting dark at 4 p.m., it was freezing cold, I already felt like I was in the zone with it. She wanted me to just do one song and as soon as I read the screenplay I was kind of like, ‘I want to do a whole album, is that OK?’ And she was like, ‘Yeah sure, go for it.’ So it was a very easy flowing process.” (Kirsten Chuba)
Attendees shared their initial reactions on social media after the screening — official full reviews of the film will drop Monday, Feb. 9 — confirming the anticipated adaptation is emotional, stylish and steamy.This version of Wuthering Heights "is a scorching hot and twisted tale," Jazz Tangcay, senior artisans editor at Variety, wrote on X. "Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi’s chemistry and sexual tension is a whole other level of HOT!""Only Emerald could take a classic, turn it on its head, make you fall completely in lust, and then utterly destroy your soul," added Tangcay. "An exquisite spectacle of craftsmanship that left me salivating over the costumes, cinematography and production design. Obsessively in love with it." (...)The movie is "utter perfection," wrote journalist Maude Garrett: "It’s not only visually impeccable with vibrancy and breathtaking shots, but this movie is the epitome of YEARNING. It will make you feel absolutely EVERYTHING during and afterwards. I loved everything about this film."Pop culture influencer Francis Dominic wrote on Instagram that Robbie, 35, and Elordi, 28, are "living rent free in my head," adding that pair are "absolutely ELECTRIC on screen. I could not keep my eyes off of them. I was in an insane chokehold."At the same time, Dominic noted, "I could’ve used more pining and intimacy but still, I had so much fun and thought all of it was so brilliant." (Benjamin VanHoose)
My day began on horseback. Under the Hollywood sign, I mounted my steed and inhaled the crisp air, trying—earnestly—to picture myself inside Emily Brontë’s gothic universe. For a fleeting moment, Los Angeles’s Griffith Park morphed into the Yorkshire Moors and I was Heathcliff galloping towards ruin. By nightfall, I would be attending the global world premiere of Wuthering Heights, the novel once again reimagined for the big screen.The movie will be released, somewhat perversely, on Valentine’s Day weekend—and if Fennell’s last film, Saltburn, offered any foreshadowing, it’s that restraint is not really her thing. Written in the 1840s, Wuthering Heights has lived many cinematic lives: a 1939 film starring Laurence Olivier was followed by adaptations in 1970, 1992, and 2011. This latest iteration feels less like a revival and more like a provocation: sharper, darker, and far more feral.I invited my friend and fellow Vogue writer Tish Weinstock to join me. (She’s also the author of How to Be a Goth, making her the perfect plus one for the night in question.) Tish arrived at my house in a black Fendi gown by Karl Lagerfeld, while I wore my mother’s Chanel dress from the same era, as well as a Christian Lacroix black velvet ribbon with a broken-heart charm around my neck. It felt fitting, if perhaps a little too on the nose.We arrived at the TCL Chinese Theatre on Hollywood Boulevard in our black finery. Warner Bros. had shut down the Walk of Fame entirely, rolling out a sprawling red carpet that felt both lavish and chaotic, with hoards of screaming fans clamoring to get closer. Attending a Hollywood premiere in Hollywood—the cattle-call choreography of velvet ropes, handlers, and hurried gestures—when you are not involved in the film is uniquely humbling. I whispered to Tish that I might leave the event hating myself, but we kept walking.From behind a velvet rope guarded closely by a man with some sort of powerful credentials, we caught glimpses of the cast. Margot Robbie appeared in a sculptural, corseted Schiaparelli gown, looking absolutely luminous. Jacob Elordi was harder to spot—even at 6’5”—though his presence somewhere was unmistakable. You could hear of him before you saw him, his name being screamed out constantly by the crowd.Inside the Chinese Theatre, that shrine to old-school movie royalty, gowns shimmered under the lights. The dress code for the evening was “Old Hollywood Glam,” with a deck of James Bond-type references and Oscars-appropriate silhouettes sent out to premiere guests ahead of time.We awkwardly clambered over people to reach our seats. In the rows, I spotted Cara Delevingne, Jeremy Scott, Petra Collins, and Phoebe Tonkin with her husband Bernie LaGrange. A woman next to me in her early 30s was practically vibrating with anticipation—and when the cast appeared briefly to introduce the film, she leaned forward and bellowed across the cavernous room: “I LOVE YOU, JACOB ELORDI.” As the lights dimmed, the applause was quickly swallowed by total silence. And for two hours and 15 minutes, everyone was transfixed.There is something unhinged about watching an explicitly sexual film in a room full of strangers. When Elordi’s Heathcliff first puts his fingers into Robbie’s mouth, the woman next to me audibly gasped before letting out a small moan. She shifted in her seat like she was trying to make what was clearly a very personal experience socially acceptable, failing spectacularly.I won’t spoil the plot, but Fennell takes bold liberties with the material, reshaping Brontë’s story for a 21st-century audience without softening its cruelty. The surreal-leaning sets and costumes do not care for historical accuracy either. (Please peep Heathcliff’s fuck-boy gold hoop earring when you watch.) Tumblr users circa 2010 would simply have gone crazy for these stills, if you ask me.When the credits rolled, the room was thick with emotion. I looked over at Tish, who, like me, had tears in her eyes. We urgently made a beeline for the powder room, where women in ballgowns swapped notes of heartbreak and devastation. One declared she wanted to go home and cry. Another, her mascara running, confessed she needed to calm her anxiousness with a cigarette.Back outside on Hollywood Boulevard, the post-picture post-mortem was split predictably amongst the genders. Men in tuxedos insisted they had known exactly what would happen, making it clear they had read the book, while others confidently predicted the film’s impending commercial success. As someone who has also read the novel, I admittedly did not know what would happen. And yet, I loved it. I might even see it again.We wandered over to the after-party, drifting past guests we’d run into at the premiere, until I was abruptly stopped at the door. “No press. You can’t come in,” a woman with a headset announced directly into my face.I decided that discretion—and dignity—were underrated virtues, and cut my losses. I walked home in my Chanel dress, thinking about the catalogue of unrequited and unfinished loves waiting for me. All I wanted was to collapse into bed, cry a little more, and let my cat curl up beside me—a modern-day antidote to an evening of gothic excess. (Eileen Kelly)
"No different to all the other scenes that we do. The movie kind of demands a lot of all of us," Robbie, 35, tells PEOPLE on the red carpet at Wuthering Heights' Wednesday, Jan. 28 premiere in Los Angeles. "My character essentially cries in every single scene, but no, it was a joy. I loved playing a character who kind of swings from one wild emotion to the other in an instant." [...]When Fennell, 40, spoke with PEOPLE on the red carpet at the premiere, she said that the most important aspect of filming steamy movie moments is "always about safety and trust and love" for her, her cast and crew."And so it's always just about making sure everyone feels super comfortable and we all are, really. We trust each other and so we try to kind of make it funny and laugh everything off," she says. "But love scenes are just the same as any other scene, really. And so we just approach it from an emotional point of view." (Tommy McArdle and Scott Huver)
Oliver, 28, who plays Isabella Linton, explained that she was familiar with the original novel, but was drawn to Fennell’s take on the book.“With a book that dense and that complex, I think anyone who's wanting to adapt it, you kind of have to zoom in and focus on the bits of it that you want to examine,” Oliver, who made her feature film debut in Fennell's 2023 movie Saltburn, explained. “I think Emerald has such a specific vision and point of view … Because I knew her before, I just was like, ‘Oh, this is so brilliant, the way she's deciding to do this.’ I just love what she's done.”Chau, who plays Nelly Dean, said she never envisioned herself working on “a period movie based on a classic British novel that people hold so dear,” and has purposefully not read Brontë’s book.“I want some distance from the movie and this whole experience and to be able to experience the book as its own thing,” the actress, 46, said. (Carly Tagen-Dye and Scott Huver)
The Wuthering Heights x Last Crumb box features a dozen large and luxurious cookies in six flavors that fit the themes of the film’s steamy romance (...)The decadence mixed with disorder actually fits the theme of Wuthering Heights perfectly. If I were to give the actual cookies in the box a rating out of 5, I would probably give it a 3.5. The collection’s good, but IMO, nothing can top the Guinness batch from December.However, the theming of this collection is a perfect 5 out of 5. Even the choice of a cherry-filled black forest cake and red velvet cookie are spot-on to match Margot Robbie’s scarlet costumes in the film and the crimson-colored hallways of Thrushcross Grange. (Rachel Chapman)
.png)
30th January 2026 - 10th May 2026The Wilson, Clarence Street, Cheltenham GL50 3JTPortuguese-British artist Paula Rego (1935-2022) was one of the great printmakers and storytellers of our time.Paula Rego: Visions of English Literature, presents three of the artist’s most ambitious and profound series of works in print making: Nursery Rhymes, Peter Pan and Jane Eyre. Created across a decade of her life, the works offer an intimate portrayal of the artist’s lifelong fascination with folklore, fairytales and literature.Alongside the prints, a variety of personal items from the artist, including unseen preparatory sketches, etching plates and Rego’s very own childhood copy of Peter Pan offer insights into her creative process of image making.From menacing figures etched into life from children’s nursery rhymes, to hallucinatory depictions of Neverland, and the turbulent relationships in Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre, Rego’s work explores innocence, cruelty, fantasy and power, through an imaginative and compelling lense.Presented by Hayward Gallery Touring, this exhibition offers audiences the chance to experience the work of an internationally celebrated artist whose bold, uncompromising vision continues to resonate today.
We already have some first reactions after the premiere of the film in L.A.
Fall in love again and again with Emerald Fennell’s imagining of #WutheringHeights. From its gorgeous set design & costumes, striking cinematography, & bombastic music by Charli XCX, the film leans into the passion + obsession of Catherine & Heathcliff’s torrid love story.
Embargo up? This is not the #WutheringHeights you read in school, and you’re either going to love it or hate it…and I loved it. Potentially my favourite performance from Jacob Elordi, definitely makes the top 3 for Margot but what made me stand up to attention was the score and cinematography - breathtaking. It’s passionate, it’s daring and explores a version of the classic that deserves our attention.
#WutheringHeights is the first hit movie of 2026. Emerald Fennell turned this classic into a completely twisted, sexual, soul-destroying story. Robbie and Elordi's chemistry is on another level. The costumes, cinematography, and production design are absolutely breathtaking.
And some other very enthusiastic comments. Nothing surprising, it always happens in premieres.
And Charli XCX has also released the tracklist of her Wuthering Heights companion album:
%20(1).jpg)
.png)
The masterstroke of red carpet method dressing by Robbie’s stylist, Andrew Mukamal, who famously came up with countless looks for the Barbie press tour, started with The Elizabeth Taylor Estate, which had reached out to him about touring the archives several months ago.“We were thrilled when Andrew got in touch, and we offered him the Taj Mahal Diamond for Margot Robbie to wear to the world premiere of ‘Wuthering Heights,'” says Tim Mendelson, a Trustee of the Elizabeth Taylor Estate. “Elizabeth cherished the symbolism of jewelry, and no other piece in her legendary collection is more connected to epic, undeniable, and tempestuous love that transcends time and even death than the Taj Mahal Diamond.” (Marion Fasel)
The piece eventually made its way into the hands of Taylor’s two-time husband Richard Burton, who presented it to Taylor in 1972 for her 40th birthday in Budapest. Not only molded into the shape of a heart, the bijoux also features an inscription with the words, “Love is Everlasting.” It’s not only a fitting nod to the romance in Wuthering Heights, but Burton played Heathcliff in Daniel Petrie’s 1958 adaptation opposite Rosemary Harris. (Matthew Velasco)
Pictures of a previous photo call at the historic Greystone Mansion in Beverly Hills can be seen on Getty Images.
With just over a fortnight to go until Emerald Fennell’s already discourse-dominating Wuthering Heights arrives in cinemas, the film’s stars have kicked off what looks set to be an incredibly stylish – and slightly unhinged – press tour.After countless Barbie-themed looks while promoting Greta Gerwig’s billion-dollar-grossing film, star Margot Robbie has pivoted to gothic-inspired fashion for her Wuthering Heights promotional engagements (think sheer lace, chokers and plenty of tousled hair).And in a move that feels in line with the marketing for Wicked and Marty Supreme, Robbie and her co-star Jacob Elordi – who are controversially playing destructive lovers Cathy and Heathcliff – are so far drumming up interest in their film by blurring the lines between fiction and reality.Robbie’s wrap gift for the Euphoria star has been revealed, and while the pair stopped short of getting matching tattoos à la the Wicked girlies (as far as we know), the former Neighbours actor had signet rings custom-made for herself and Elordi.The bespoke jewellery features two skeletons entwined with each other – in the same pose as the film’s posters – and the Emily Brontë quote: “Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.” It’s a beautiful, but rather intense, gift for a co-worker, eh?This came just days after the release of a Vogue Australia interview, which saw the two Queenslanders trade anecdotes about their time filming the movie. Robbie – who also served as a producer – recalled how Elordi, “as Heathcliff”, filled her dressing room with red roses on Valentine’s Day.“It wasn’t just the gesture of the roses, it was the thing written from Heathcliff, and that little tombstone thing,” she said. “I was like, ah, crafts! Love that. It was crafty, it was meaningful, it was dramatic.”And in another interview, with US platform Fandango, Elordi admitted he had an “obsession” with Robbie during filming. “If you have the opportunity to share a film set with Margot Robbie, you’re going to make sure you’re within five to 10 metres at all times,” he said. “Watching how she drinks tea, how she eats her food, how she does it. When is it going to slip? When is the thing going to come undone? And, it never comes undone.”It’s a confession that would, in any other industry, spark a call from HR. But to market a film in 2026? The winning vibe nowadays seems to be “the more delulu, the better”. Who cares that Robbie is married with a baby, and Elordi is reportedly back with his influencer ex? Perhaps Warner Bros think we’ll forget these key details. (Rachel McGrath)
Even though it isn’t released for another fortnight, you may already have formed strong opinions about Emerald Fennell’s Wuthering Heights. Perhaps you hold the position that the novel is a text so sacred that any adaptation whatsoever is equivalent to sacrilege. Or maybe you are excited to see what a noted iconoclast such as Fennell will do with something as fusty as a 179-year-old book.Either way, it is likely that your key takeaway from the Wuthering Heights press tour so far is that it’s getting a bit much. It has now been revealed that Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi have matching rings decorated with two hugging skeletons and the phrase “Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same”.Maybe if that was the extent of it, this would be fine. But it has come at the thin end of a campaign during which Elordi and Robbie have both tried really, really hard to make everyone think they are besotted lovers and not professional colleagues with a product to sell.There was the interview in January in which Robbie revealed that, during filming, Elordi would always make sure he was closely watching her on set, even when he was not required, and that even his occasional absence would result in her feeling “lost, like a kid without their blanket or something.” Or the time when Elordi claimed they had a “mutual obsession”. Or when Robbie revealed that Elordi filled her room with roses on Valentine’s day, prompting her to think “Oh, he’s probably a very good boyfriend”.It all sounds highly romantic and very sexy … at least until you remember that Margot Robbie is married to Tom Ackerley, with whom she has a child who was four months old at the time of the Valentine’s Day roses, that she and Ackerley are co-producers of Wuthering Heights, and that this campaign is probably the product of a high-level discussion between them and the Warner Bros publicity department during which everybody agreed on the precise degree to which Robbie would pretend to be gooey-eyed about her co-star.It’s all getting a bit Wicked, isn’t it? That had a press cycle so overcooked that, in order to enjoy the film, you had to divorce yourself from the image of Ariana Grande and Cynthia Erivo clinging to each other during every interview and sobbing like they’d just watched their childhood houses burn down.Is this approach becoming the norm? Is this how stupid we’ve become? Obviously film campaigns have had to change with the times, because the old way of magazine profiles and formal sit-down interviews has given way to nebulous social media buzz. But to watch Robbie and Elordi go moony-eyed over each other – knowing full well they’ll drop the artifice like a stone when they each get something new to promote – is to realise that something has gone badly wrong.Do we really need to form parasocial relationships with the people we see in films, tailored specifically to the tone of the project, in order to enjoy them? Wasn’t there a time when we just innately understood that an actor’s performance began with the opening credits and ended when the lights went up?It makes you worry for the future. For instance, Greta Gerwig’s new Narnia film is due to be released this year, and Emma Mackey is playing the witch. Does this mean that, a few months before its release, Mackey will start pretending that her family are virulently anti-Christmas? Is she going to do TikToks in which she growls at children? Will she do a press junket next to a real life lion that she will be contractually obliged to slag off at every opportunity?The hope has to be that all these shenanigans will help Wuthering Heights cross over and become a Barbie-style phenomenon. But it’s coming at the expense of our brain cells. We’re all adults here. We should be able to tell the difference between an actor and the character they play, or else we’re surely doomed.Hopefully this is the high watermark of the Wuthering Heights campaign, with any luck this element of the promotion will recede, and the final fortnight will be about the film itself and not the extent to which the leads are willing to pretend to be in love. That is, unless Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi want to adopt a child before its release, and agree to raise it to adulthood. That really would be a level of commitment we could all get behind. (Stuart Heritage)
While Brontë’s book is primarily set in the late 18th century, painstakingly recreating Georgian architectural details was not at the top of the to-do list for Davies and her team, including set decorator Charlotte Dirickx. (The pair also worked on Saltburn together.) “We were aiming for an accuracy of feeling rather than period,” explains Davies. “All the design and the vision of it had to be felt before it was understood. We were playing into every sensation. We often spoke about how it’d be great if we could have Smell-O-Vision. It’d be lovely to give the audience bits of the walls that you can touch.”Many literature lovers and fans of the book are already grumbling on Reddit about every aspect of this film, which hits theaters February 13: from the casting of Margot Robbie as Catherine and Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff (these critiques are valid) to the plot (please note the quotation marks around the film’s title!) to the similarly anachronistic costumes. This is not your mother’s—or even the BBC’s—Wuthering Heights. There’s a fan-fiction-like quality to it, right down to the sexy scenes that certainly don’t appear in the novel. But whatever your opinion, there’s no denying that it is an absolutely immersive visual feast—the closest thing possible to being able to touch, taste, or smell through a screen.Fennell has said she “wanted to make something that made me feel like I felt when I first read it” as a teenager, and according to Davies, that’s exactly what they did, pulling references from things a teenager in the late ’90s or early 2000s would’ve been familiar with, such as Gone With the Wind and Stanley Kubrick’s films. “Once we found our language, we sort of knew just to keep the dials turned up,” she says. So cue the Charli XCX soundtrack, and let’s break down what all of the design choices mean.If ever there were two literary foils, it is Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange, and the film leans just as heavily on this dichotomy. The former sits high on a hill where the wind never seems to cease (hence its name), and it is dark, cold, and “bruised,” says Davies, with nature always encroaching. It is where Catherine and Heathcliff bond as children. A place the inhabitants want to escape, it was only fitting for Davies to add a large, dramatic archway for characters to pass through when entering and exiting the courtyard, symbolizing a crossing of the threshold between the sad world inside and the possibilities beyond.When Catherine leaves Wuthering Heights and goes to Thrushcross Grange for the first time, “it’s technicolor,” says Davies. “It’s like she’s never seen this before.” (She hasn’t!) There she meets her neighbors, Edgar and Isabella Linton, and is enveloped in a rainbow of colors and a cornucopia of fabrics—including drapes made of cellophane—and textures. “It looked like a jewelry box,” says Dirickx.Make your own inference about what this means in this hot and heavy version of Wuthering Heights, but everything in this movie is wet. During AD’s video tour of the Thrushcross Grange set, the camera offers a close-up look at the clear droplets adorning the walls in the dining room. “I think my favorite thing about the room is how it looks like there is really beautiful condensation—like the walls are sweating, but in a very beautiful way,” Margot Robbie says. When Catherine eventually falls ill in the film, the walls of her room (made to look like her skin—more on that coming up!) drip with her actual sweat as well.Up at Wuthering Heights, the exterior of the home is covered in shiny tiles, something that definitely would not have appeared on an actual home built in Northern England in the 1500s, but Davies selected it for the material’s ability to “feel the sweat and rain that happens all the time there,” she says. “I knew I wanted something shiny and moist.”Technically, Fennell forgoes exploring Catherine’s ghost to focus much more on concerns of the earthly body…. But these houses still feel haunted, especially with all of the body parts adorning Thrushcross Grange. Plaster hands made from molds of the hands of the film crew are everywhere, appearing as candleholders, a sculpture emerging from the fireplace, and on ceiling roses in every room. “They’re quite a gothic symbol,” says Davies. “It was about [the characters] having their hands on everything. And it’s just that subconscious feeling for the audience, the uneasiness of what those hands are up to. It’s just playing on that sensuality and sexuality of the characters’ love story.”Other human traits in the design include a table with a hair curtain and the walls of Catherine’s Thrushcross Grange bedroom, which are made to look exactly like her skin. To accomplish this, Davies printed a picture of Margot Robbie’s arm directly onto pieces of fabric, which were then covered in stretched latex to create wall panels. “In that final top shot [of the film], you can see her veins on the carpet too,” reveals Dirickx. Does the sweat pouring from her walls make more sense now? Not only that, but in one scene, tiny prop leeches suck on the walls as well as on Robbie’s body.Can you spoil a nearly 180-year-old tale? Well, anyway, after Catherine’s first taste of color and comfort at Thrushcross Grange, she marries Edgar Linton and moves in. You’d think that escaping the prison-like Wuthering Heights (where the ceiling in the kitchen purposefully encroaches upon Jacob Elordi’s six-foot-five frame) would bring her happiness, but her longing for Heathcliff takes hold and doesn’t let go. “Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same,” she famously says. She is a prisoner all over again in her new surroundings, and this is represented in the sets. In the library, a lamb sits encased in glass. At dinner, Catherine absentmindedly sticks her finger into an aspic mold with a fish in it.In the garden, goldfish swim in clear glass vases. And, perhaps most poignantly, everything exists in miniature as Isabella Linton’s plaything, the dollhouse that sits in the dining room at Thrushcross Grange. It was written into the script by Fennell, and “is such an important part, I think, of her understanding of that book and how she imagined it,” Davies says. (Rachel Wallace)
So I did something that felt slightly unhinged in the moment, deleting the apps and picking up a book I'd bought two years ago but never opened, 'Jane Eyre' by Charlotte Brontë, which had been sitting there accumulating dust and silent judgment. Six months later, I'm sitting here with a stack of Victorian novels beside me and a brain that feels fundamentally reconfigured, as though some dormant neural pathways have suddenly remembered how to function.The first week was brutal in ways I hadn't anticipated, my fingers reaching for my phone with that reflexive muscle memory, unlocking it and staring at the home screen before remembering there was nothing to scroll through anymore. But then Jane Eyre pulled me in with its deliberate pacing and intricate prose, and I began to understand something about Victorian novels that I'd never grasped before. They demand your full attention in a way that nothing else quite does, refusing to be skimmed while waiting for the chai to boil, insisting that you sit down and actually read, word by word, page by page. [...]Another underrated discovery was 'The Tenant of Wildfell Hall' by Anne Brontë, whose literary accomplishments are perpetually overshadowed by her more famous sisters' reputations. Anne wrote this remarkably bold novel about a woman leaving an abusive marriage in 1848, a time when women legally couldn't own property or make independent decisions about their lives. (Girish Shukla)
More Wuthering Heights 2026 merchandising. BlackMilk Clothing has an officially licensed collection inspired by the movie:
.png)
Some loves do not arrive gently.
They lean in. They linger. They refuse to leave.This officially licensed "Wuthering Heights" collection is shaped by the ache that lives between bodies, by desire held too long and spoken too late. Drawn from the world of the upcoming film, it carries the hush of moors at dusk, the heat of breath against skin, the tremor of wanting that never quite settles.
Velvet moves like memory, warm, deliberate, impossible to ignore. Lace drifts and clings in equal measure, tracing the body as though remembering it. Sheer layers hover and fall, catching light and shadow like the moment before surrender, when longing sharpens and everything else fades.
Each piece feels intimate, as if it belongs to a private hour. Dresses follow the body with quiet insistence, skimming, pooling, waiting. Coats wrap close, heavy with presence, with the promise of warmth that feels almost dangerous. Words appear not as decoration but as murmurs, confessions stitched into fabric, meant to be read slowly, felt rather than understood.
The palette lives in shadow and heat, black as night, black cherry as wine-dark longing, juniper as dusk pressed into green. Textures layer like sensation: burned velvet against bare skin, lace against air, softness edged with ache.
Inspired by "Wuthering Heights", this collection holds the kind of love that alters you. Not sweet. Not fleeting. A devotion that presses close, that stains the soul, that whispers be with me long after the room has gone quiet.
Released for Valentine’s Day, this is romance stripped of softness. It is for those who crave closeness that borders on obsession, for lovers of gothic fashion and cinematic silhouettes that feel lived-in, intimate, and undeniably charged.
Wear it like a secret you never meant to tell.
Like a touch that stays.
Like a love that would rather undo you than ever let you go.
Kicking off proceedings yesterday, Margot appeared in a baroque-meets-IG-baddie take on the naked dress: a lacy McQueen number from spring 2026 that would have 18th-century ladies reaching for their smelling salts. [...]Confirming that Robbie’s take on the Brontë heroine will be more Bridgerton-style bodice ripper, the actress also stepped out in a teeny-tiny Roberto Cavalli minidress, paired with Louboutins: the obvious choice of footwear for navigating the Yorkshire moors. (Olivia Allen)
1939's Wuthering Heights, starring Laurence Olivier as Heathcliff and Merle Oberon as Cathy, will be available to stream on HBO Max from February 1, among the many titles joining the streaming platform next month. This is the first known movie adaptation of Wuthering Heights with sound; it went on to be nominated for eight Oscars and has a 96% on Rotten Tomatoes from 25 reviews.The streaming release of arguably the most famous movie version of this story comes at the perfect time for those who want to engage in a discussion about adaptations of Wuthering Heights. Emerald Fennell's new Wuthering Heights, starring Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi, will hit theaters on February 13, aiming to make the most of the Valentine's Day weekend. [...]Other adaptations of Wuthering Heights viewers could check out at this time include the 1992 version with Ralph Fiennes and Juliette Binoche on Pluto TV — the first movie to adapt the entire novel, rather than just the first half — and the 2011 one with Kaya Scodelario and James Howson on AMC+. However, historically, problems such as Heathcliff nearly always being played by a white actor and too much focus on the romance elements have persisted. (Abigail Stevens)
‘The greatest love story of all time!”So proclaims the trailer for Emerald Fennell’s film adaptation of Wuthering Heights. Images of Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi looking moody and sultry abound. If the message isn’t clear enough, it’s also being released this Valentine’s Day. Did we read the same book, Ms Fennell?Wuthering Heights, written by Emily Brontë and published in 1847, is one of the most original books in the English language. But a love story it ain’t. Open the book at any point and what you find is a devastating description of domestic violence and intergenerational trauma.The story takes place in and around a farmhouse called Wuthering Heights on the Yorkshire Moors. During a business trip to Liverpool, the master of the house encounters a starving orphan and decides to raise him alongside his own children, Hindley and Catherine. He names him Heathcliff. Rather than welcoming the foundling, Hindley tortures him. He throws an iron weight at Heathcliff’s head then knocks him under a horse.When Hindley inherits Wuthering Heights, he unleashes a reign of terror. During his drunken rages, he sticks a carving knife into his housekeeper’s mouth and drops his own baby over the banisters of the staircase. During these years, Heathcliff and Catherine develop a co-dependent bond while perpetuating the cruelty inflicted on them with everyone they encounter.Heathcliff and Catherine describe their feelings for one another as “love”, but there is little romance. In a famous passage, Catherine tells the trusty housekeeper that her miseries have also been Heathcliff’s. “I am Heathcliff!” She says. “He’s always, always in my mind: not as a pleasure, any more than I am always a pleasure to myself, but as my own being.”The intensity of their emotions, and their identification as a single traumatised unit, has inspired the reductive (and rather boring) notion that Brontë wrote a love story set on the moors. Jane Austen in gum boots, if you will.Kate Bush’s brilliant debut single “Wuthering Heights” from 1978 perpetuated that myth. We’d roll and fall in green … You had a temper like my jealousy … I needed to possess you. What’s not to like? The name “Heathcliff” became a synonym for a brooding, sullen and desperately sexy rebel. The James Dean of English fiction. Or should that be Jacob Elordi?Smash cut back to the book. In Brontë’s Heathcliff, we get a portrait of a psychotic misanthrope, who commits random acts of violence against everyone around him. When he marries, it’s not to Catherine, but a girl he hates. He jeers at her for mistaking him as a ‘hero of romance’, throws a carving knife at her face and hangs her dog. He then kidnaps Catherine’s daughter, forces her to marry his son, beats her about the head and dreams of – in his own words – submitting both of them to slow vivisection as an evening’s amusement.“He’s not a rough diamond,” Catherine says at one point. “He’s a fierce, pitiless, wolfish man … There’s my picture: and I’m his friend.”So where did Brontë get the inspiration for this bizarre and terrifying character?Emily Brontë grew up in Haworth Parsonage on the edge of the Yorkshire moors. Her mother died when she was little as did two of her sisters. The four remaining Brontë children – Charlotte, Anne, Branwell and Emily – struggled into adulthood together.Emily felt a deep connection to the landscape of her home, just as Catherine does in Wuthering Heights. She only left Haworth on a few occasions and, each time, her mental health deteriorated. Her older sister Charlotte (author of Jane Eyre) described what happened when they went to boarding school:Every morning when she woke, the vision of home and the moors rushed on her, and darkened and saddened the day that lay before her … I felt in my heart she would die if she did not go home, and with this conviction obtained her recall.’’“He’s not a rough diamond,” Catherine says at one point. “He’s a fierce, pitiless, wolfish man … There’s my picture: and I’m his friend.”So where did Brontë get the inspiration for this bizarre and terrifying character?Emily Bronte grew up in Haworth Parsonage on the edge of the Yorkshire moors. Her mother died when she was little as did two of her sisters. The four remaining Brontë children – Charlotte, Anne, Branwell and Emily – struggled into adulthood together.Emily felt a deep connection to the landscape of her home, just as Catherine does in Wuthering Heights. She only left Haworth on a few occasions and, each time, her mental health deteriorated. Her older sister Charlotte (author of Jane Eyre) described what happened when they went to boarding school:Every morning when she woke, the vision of home and the moors rushed on her, and darkened and saddened the day that lay before her … I felt in my heart she would die if she did not go home, and with this conviction obtained her recall.’’This terror is evident in the novels the three sisters wrote around the same time, each of which revolves around a violent maniac. Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre is haunted by the “madwoman in the attic” at Thornfield Hall, while the heroine of Anne Brontë’s The Tenant of Wildfell Hall is abused by her violent, alcoholic husband. And then there’s Heathcliff.Knowing about Emily’s brother helps us make sense of Heathcliff and Catherine’s relationship. I don’t read this as a romantic love affair, but the co-dependence of abused siblings. The inquiry running through Wuthering Heights isn’t “will they, won’t they?”, but something far more interesting. How do people move on from traumatic childhoods? Heathcliff and Catherine can’t, which is why Brontë bumps off Catherine halfway through the book.Gradually, the focus moves to the next generation and the relationship between Hareton (son of Hindley) and Catherine’s daughter. They too are traumatised individuals, who have been tormented by Heathcliff just as he was in his childhood. At first, Hareton and Catherine Junior hate one another, but they make a conscious decision to break the cycle. They learn compassion and that, in turn, leads to love. If Wuthering Heights can be said to have romantic leads, it should be Hareton and Catherine Junior. But Kate Bush never sang, “Hareton, It’s me, I’m Cathy Junior” and they’re not even in the cast list for Emerald Fennell’s film.Does it matter if a film adaptation promotes Wuthering Heights as the greatest love story of all time? In theory, no. Reinterpretation is what keeps stories alive. But I do have a problem with the way an perceptive portrait of domestic violence is continually translated into a sadomasochistic sex fantasy.Almost two hundred years on from Emily Brontë’s day, domestic violence remains one of the intractable evils in our society. According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, one in four women and one in eight men in Australia have experienced family and domestic violence by a partner or family member.You can interpret Wuthering Heights in any number of ways, but you cannot take the domestic violence out of it. So the more we portray Wuthering Heights as a love story and Heathcliff as a sex symbol, the more we betray the intention of Emily Brontë’s complex masterpiece, blur the lines between desire and violence, and promote the age-old lie that true love hurts.Wuthering Heights continues to inspire wonder in readers and is one of the syllabus set classics that most resonates with teenagers. I believe it does this because Emily Brontë set out to write something much more interesting than a love story – conventional or otherwise.So, by all means, go see Wuthering Heights at the cinema – but maybe not on Valentine’s Day. (Jonty Claypole)
by Emily BrontëPenguin BooksISBN: 978-0143139140February 3, 2026Emily Brontë’s only novel and a gothic classic—a gripping story of obsession, revenge, and tragedy—now the feature film “Wuthering Heights” from Emerald Fennell, which captures the spirit of this epic love story and stars Margot Robbie as Cathy and Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff.
.png)
by Emily BrontëPenguin BooksUPC: 9780593513552February 3, 2026
%20(1).jpg)
by Emily BrontëSimon & SchusterISBN: Female Filmmakers CollectionFeburary 3, 2026Set against the desolate beauty of the Yorkshire moors, the all-consuming love between Catherine Earnshaw and the foundling Heathcliff has captivated readers for centuries. When forces of class and society tear them apart, Heathcliff embarks on a bitter quest for vengeance that threatens to destroy two generations of the Linton and Earnshaw families.This paperback is part of Simon & Schuster's Female Filmmakers Collection, a series of books thoughtfully curated by female filmmakers. Each title includes an introduction by a woman who has made an indelible impact on cinema. Celebrate over a century of female filmmaking and discover the classics—timeless and modern—that inspired the creators behind your favorite films.
When I say I have been yearning for Emerald Fennell’s book to screen adaptation of Wuthering Heights, that’s putting it lightly. Especially now we’ve heard from the Saltburn director herself on what we can expect from her version of Emily Brontë’s famous classic.Arriving at Cineworld on 13th February, you can book tickets now to see it in IMAX and Superscreen.While the purists are in uproar over casting, historical accuracy, and the like of Wuthering Heights, I couldn’t be more excited to see something that is sure to be so visually eye-catching and entirely Emerald Fennell. Who doesn’t love a good passionate yet soul-destroying love story?Emerald wanted to create an adaptation that encompassed how it felt to read it for the first timeEveryone experiences art differently, whether it’s a book or a film. This is Emerald Fennell’s version of Wuthering Heights, both the way she experienced it as a teenager, as well as everything she hoped for but didn’t get. It’s an amalgamation of Brontë’s work with Fennell’s own whimsical, lovesick imagination. And we can all relate to that, right?That’s what Margot Robbie had to say about it in an interview with Fandango, and the idea has me absolutely enchanted. “There’s been so many movies and TV series and stuff made, but I think the point of difference here is this is Emerald making you feel the way the book made her feel when she read it.”When talking about taking on an adaptation of a book as pivotal as this, Fennell said, “Look, there’s a version that I remembered reading that isn’t quite real. And there’s a version where I wanted stuff to happen that never did. And so it is Wuthering Heights, and it isn’t.”If you’ve watched any of Emerald Fennell’s other movies, you’ll be very happy to be back inside her head for Wuthering Heights, that’s for sure. It’s all provocative fun and a little bit of weirdness.Emerald wants us to cry so hard we vomit while watching Wuthering HeightsIn the same all-cast interview, Robbie also pulled back the curtain on something else Fennell had disclosed with the star about her hopes for the adaptation: “I want people to cry so hard they vomit.”Sobbing? Crying? It’s all the same thing at this point. And we all know Emerald loves bodily fluids if that bathtub scene in Saltburn is anything to go by.Whether you find that visual disgusting or not, I think this is a pretty great indicator of how tumultuous this adaptation is going to be. And I’m ready to be ruined – if that wasn’t already completely obvious.The way Emerald Fennells talks about the relationship between Cathy and Heathcliff is just everythingIf you’re not here for stories that find love in unlikely places or it being so wrong it’s right, then fine, maybe this isn’t for you. Like I said, I love a story that emotionally ruins me, and that’s exactly how Fennell describes it.“When I first read it, it destroyed me. But it didn’t just destroy me, because it’s beautiful and it’s sad. It’s a very destabilising work of art. It’s a very complicated thing, because what Emily Brontë asks us to do is to love two– In fact, not two, a whole realm of incredibly difficult and unlovable characters.”There’s nothing more interesting to me than, you know, making everyone fall in love with people who maybe aren’t traditionally lovable.”Hell yes, sign me up!Emerald Fennell’s explanation of the quotation marks around Wuthering Heights and her commitment to the classic that she lovesSome may disagree on this, but I actually think Emerald Fennell really respects Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights in its original form, and that she shows that appreciation by completely cutting it up and sticking it back together in a way that is entirely different.The fact of the matter is you’ll never be able to adapt something completely faithfully. Still, Fennell put the work in – speaking to the Brontë parsonage and to other fans of the book in order to create something they feel a part of.However, when talking about the choice of quote marks around the title on the film poster, Fennell said, The thing for me is that you can’t adapt a book as dense and complicated and difficult as this book. I can’t say I’m making Wuthering Heights. It’s not possible. What I can say is I’m making a version of it.”Also, as previously pointed out by the queen Margot Robbie, there’s been a lot of adaptations. What’s the point in producing the same thing again? Here for female directors putting their own stamp on things and creating something completely left field and fun.The costume design is just incredibleSure, fine, they’re not exactly accurate to the period, but what Jacqueline Durran has achieved is simply enchanting. Described as “a fantasy of a fantasy”, tailored to the character rather than the time period of the book.Margot Robbie’s Cathy is a blonde bombshell sporting German milkmaid-esque corsets and Elton John sunglasses that would put the musician to shame.In an interview with Vogue Australia, Duran shared that between 45 and 50 costumes were made for Cathy, with inspiration taken anywhere from Elizabethan to Victorian times, to the 1950s, and more modern styles.It’s all beautifully meshed together, incredibly bold, and, yes, provocative.The skin wall is insane – as are all the other visualsThe costumes are amazing – but, holy moly, can we take a moment to talk about the visuals? All we have to go on is the trailer, but I am simply obsessed with the skin wall and a frustrated Cathy that we see thrown against it, digging her fingers into the flesh.Then there’s Thrushcross Grange, baby blue and there in miniature too as the dollhouse, with shots of Cathy mirrored as both a doll and Margot Robbie in all her beauty. Of course, there’s the dramatic Yorkshire moors, too, and the pooling red vinyl floor that seems to continue off of Cathy’s dramatic bloodred skirt.This movie is about to be my entire personality.Charli xcx has written the soundtrackShe gave us BRAT summer, and now she’s giving us whimsical winter with her tracks for the Wuthering Heights soundtrack. A few tracks have already been released ahead of the film, including “Chains of Love” which I’m simply obsessed with.I think it’s a choice to have one artist signed on for the whole soundtrack. It’s giving seamless. It’s giving capsule. It’s giving chic. And I think Charli xcx’s sound is perfect – electric and experimental while still being sultry and maybe a little bit dirty. (Alice Marshall)
Do you believe films based on literature have a duty to be faithful to the source material, or should filmmakers run with their interpretations?I tend to favor adaptations that try to capture the spirit of the literary base-text, as opposed to total fidelity. The most recent Frankenstein, for instance, also starring Jacob Elordi, veers wildly from Shelley’s original, yet seems also to convey the wonderfully complex strangeness that she built into her amazing novel. In terms of Wuthering Heights adaptations, I appreciate the versions that try to account for the multi-generational aspect of her plot. Most film versions stick to Cathy and Heathcliff. Cutting the entire second half of the novel isn’t in keeping with the spirit of her work.Yes, “Wuthering Heights” is most famous for the romance between Catherine and Heathcliff. What other aspects deserve more attention?Certainly, the second half of the novel, which centers on the children of the key first-half figures, deserves more filmic representation. Versions that only give us the first half undercut the complexity of Brontë’s non-linear plot, not to mention the various doppelganger effects at play. The novel’s emphasis on cycles of violence and the extent to which the past haunts the present gather particular force in the novel’s second half. I also think that Nelly [Dean] deserves more attention. While she’s not the narrator proper (that’s Lockwood, in the novel’s framing device), she’s nevertheless the key to all information that we get about both the Earnshaws and the Lintons in the novel.What about “Wuthering Heights” is often misunderstood by modern audiences?I think that the drama of the tortured love theme often distracts away from the emphasis Brontë places throughout the novel on properties and possessions. This is a novel deeply interested in who owns what — and how they come into that ownership. While the supernatural theme doubles down on “possession,” it’s Brontë’s critical view of the patriarchal arrangements of the material world that carries the most force.Of past film versions of the book, which is your favorite and why?All of them have flaws; some are pretty terrible. While I show clips from different versions in class, my favorite is Peter Kosminsky’s 1992 adaption, which stars Juliette Binoche and Ralph Fiennes. There are weird things about it, no doubt, but I appreciate the efforts to translate the spirit of the work while also attending to the entirety of Brontë’s plotting.Why is it important to keep discussions of “Wuthering Heights” and other classic works alive today?Classic works such as Brontë’s novel matter more than ever because they force us to think deeply about the complexities of our shared humanity. Human existence cannot be reduced to convenient binaries. “Wuthering Heights,” for instance, asks us to question our tendency to conceive of people as either insiders or outsiders. Classic literary works, like all great art, challenge us to reflect on matters of sameness and difference, to develop empathy for others, and to better understand the ways that the past informs the present. (J.D. Valdepenas)
If you have clicked through and are reading this article right now, I assume you are in one of two camps. Perhaps you’ve actually read Wuthering Heights and think I’m a complete idiot for making it decades without reading or understanding the plot of Emily Bronttë’s seminal work. Or, perhaps you are a person who, like me, has not yet read the book ahead of its upcoming big screen adaptation, and weren’t so sure about the tone of Emerald Fennell’s 2026 movie release.If you are in the latter camp, I must warn you the movie is not an epic romance. Yes, I’m as shocked as you (maybe) are. I honestly only know this because I went to an all-hands meeting with the CinemaBlend team the other day and enthusiastically spoke about Jacob Elordi and Margot Robbie doing a romance together. It was awkward crickets in the room for a hot minute before my colleague finally told me I needed to reset my expectations about what’s coming in Wuthering Heights. Embarrassing? Positively. Was I grateful for the heads up? Only time will tell.To my credit, Valentine’s Day is usually a big weekend at the box office for some sort of romantic flick. This slot can lend itself to some darker romances like Fifty Shades of Grey, but a lot of February releases tend to be lighthearted, like How to Lose A Guy In 10 Days or Hitch. So, sorry I didn’t totally get the memo here with Wuthering Heights.I honestly probably should have seen this turn of events coming. I did see Saltburn, and it was one of the wildest movies tonally I’d ever gotten through. Given Fennell’s track record with that movie and Promising Young Woman, I suppose I should have expected some complications outside of Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi staring adoringly into one another’s eyes.Listen: I know I’ve outed myself as ridiculously uninformed, here, but to defend myself once more: It’s not as if I thought this would be a rom-com in the vein of Emma. You can tell from the Wuthering Heights trailer there will absolutely be some drama. I know, for example, there are some familial complications, and that Heathcliff must leave to seek a fortune. From what I’ve seen, Margot Robbie’s character seems to be left with few choices in the marriage department. I guess I just assumed this would all wrap up with a neat little bow, or at least some Titanic-level romantic ending.That’s not true in the least, apparently, and we’ve either gotten some genius level marketing that will surprise audiences (I blame the use of Charli XCX’s pop track “Chains of Love”), or else I’m like the last person to know what Brontë’s novel is about. I honestly don’t want to spoil anyone or even look into how Wuthering Heights wraps, so I’m planning to go into the movie unspoiled, then read the book, now. Still, I do think it’s worth a warning that this will not be the feel good hit of 2026. Emerald Fennell clearly prefers her storytelling to be a little bit messed up, and that will continue with the release of Wuthering Heights next month. Though the casting director did even say "English lit fans" won't be happy. So, who really knows what's coming down the pipeline?Just don’t say I didn’t warn ya. (Jessica Rawden)
To keep you on your toes, we’ve also included some hot-right-now book picks here, the likes of book 6 in the “Game Changers” series (behind the sensation that is Heated Rivalry) and Wuthering Heights: the latter about to be given a new, 21st-century lease on life by Margot Robbie and Jacob Elordi.Let the coziness commence.The Brontë Sisters Boxed Set: Jane Eyre, Wuthering Heights, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, VilletteSure, Wuthering Heights is getting all the attention right now, what with its on-screen version coming to theaters a day before Valentine’s Day, but the novels of Emily Brontë’s sisters are equally era-defining. This box set from Penguin Classics has it all: from Jane Eyre, which will make someone named Mr. Rochester live in your head rent-free, to The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, a 1848 title that centers on a young widow who becomes the talk of the town courtesy of her hyper-independent and reclusive personality.The best part about this comfort-read buy: Once you devour Wuthering Heights in a few sittings, you can easily reach for another Brontë masterpiece, and then another. Maybe it’s just us, but we’d be tempted to call in sick to work — just for the sake of diving deeper into the psyches of female heroines who manage to reinvent themselves after tragic pasts. (Stacia Datskovska)
Jane Eyre (2011)Mia Wasikowska and Michael Fassbender lead this moody and romantic adaptation of Charlotte Brontë’s most famous novel. After enduring a cruel and abusive childhood as an orphan, Jane Eyre (Mia Wasikowska) hopes to gain some independence by seeking employment as a governess at Thornfield Hall. There, Jane develops a unique and complex relationship with Thornfield’s owner, the brooding Mr. Rochester (Michael Fassbender). While the two come to realize their feelings for each other are more than just friendly, a disturbing mystery keeps them from taking their relationship further. (Chelsey Sanchez and Ella Ceron)
